Tag Archives: united nations



Months after President Obama frankly admitted that the United States had “tortured some folks” as part of the War on Terror, a new report submitted to the United Nations Committee Against Torture has been released that excoriates his administration for shielding the officials responsible from prosecution.

The report describes the post-9/11 torture program as “breathtaking in scope”, and indicts both the Bush and Obama administrations for complicity in it – the former through design and implementation, and the latter through its ongoing attempts to obstruct justice. Noting that the program caused grievous harm to countless individuals and in many cases went as far as murder, the report calls for the United States to “promptly and impartially prosecute senior military and civilian officials responsible for authorizing, acquiescing, or consenting in any way to acts of torture.”

In specifically naming former President George W. Bush, Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo and former CIA contractor James Mitchell, among many others, as individuals who sanctioned torture at the highest levels, the report highlights a gaping hole in President Obama’s promise to reassert America’s moral standing during his administration. Not only have the cited individuals not been charged with any crime for their role in the torture program, Obama has repeatedly reiterated his mantra of “looking forward, not backwards” to protect them from accountability.

Needless to say, you shouldn’t try that defense in court if you’re an ordinary American on trial for, say, a drug crime.

It’s also worth remembering that, horrific as it was, the torture regime described in the report was only a tiny part of the wide-ranging human rights abuses the United States committed after 9/11. It doesn’t even account for the network of prisons where hundreds of thousands of people were detained in Iraq and Afghanistan – many of whom suffered beatings, rape and murder at the hands of U.S. soldiers.

The environment that allowed such treatment was again authorized at the highest levels, but just as with the CIA program the only people to receive any legal sanction for these actions have been low-level soldiers who’ve essentially been used as scapegoats for the crimes of their superiors.

By refusing to prosecute Bush-era officials for their culpability in major human rights abuses such as the CIA program and Abu Ghraib, President Obama is not just failing to enforce justice but is essentially guaranteeing that such abuses will happen again in the future. His administration has demonstrated that even if government officials perpetrate the most heinous crimes imaginable, they will still be able to rely on their peers to conceal their wrongdoing and protect them from prosecution. This not only erodes the rule of law, it also helps create a culture of impunity that will inevitably give rise to such actions once again.

The UN report cites former Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh as describing the Bush administration’s legal definition of torture as, “so narrow that it would have exculpated Saddam Hussein.” To his credit Barack Obama has finally called a spade a spade and identified Bush officials actions for what they were: torture. Having done so, it’s now incumbent on him to stop protecting the officials who authorized this crime from legal scrutiny.

Photo: Wathiq Khuzaie/Getty Images


Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions

By Christof Heyns

The UN report condemning the broad use of drones, the extrajudicial killings of people around the world, the violation of sovereignty, and the blatant dismissal of international law by the United States.

Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions

An Open (and honest) Letter to Kevin Galalae

This letter has been written in response to our episode, “Killing Us Softly (Interview with Kevin Galalae), released May 14th, 2014. 

Dear Kevin Galalae, 

First off, I wanted to say thanks for coming on the show and congratulations on completing your mission in Rome. I found that our conversation was truly worth having, and I feel that your activism is courageous and takes a lot of fortitude. It is not easy to sacrifice so much over a subject matter such as this—namely, your health, family life, and personal safety—let alone stand in front of the gates of the Papacy to address undercover human genocide to a nation of people who are merely scratching the surface of this topic.

I reached out to you in early May because I have come to terms with the role of the American Eugenics movement in domestic and international law. We can both agree that there is a subversive element in the pretty pin-up called “international cooperation” and how, underneath the hood of this death machine, there is an engine of extermination humming away and racing vorwarts. You, I, and the other 90% of the global population have become targets to their gene manipulating SV40 virus, geo-engineering, Monsanto and Cargill biotech, the prison system, and a host of other social, chemical onslaughts that threaten our very existence and future offspring. I pray that I will have children of my own one day, and that they will not have to grow up in such an uncertain and ominous future.

However, during and after the interview, I felt as if much of the origins—the roots of this genocide—were rather obfuscated by our dialogue. I listened mostly to what you had to say, but did not respond in my normal ranting manner because I was a bit in shock as to the twist you had placed on the matter. That conversation never left me, and I have mulled it over for months. Only until now have I had the courage to outright challenge a potential ally in order to get into the heart of the matter. I needed time and planning in order to pinpoint the core philosophies of our fascist “benefactors” you speak and their beneficiaries, whom are the single, most solitary element that comprises the entire structure of the global political Ponzi scheme called the New World Order.

So, in the words of Lenin, “What is to be done?” I should probably start by saying we should both come clean and speak truthfully to our audiences. Let us not have them believe that this is embedded in the international world order. It is not. The plans to depopulate the planet are firmly in the hands of genetic Puritans; people that believe that they are biologically superior to the other roughly 6,999,700 billion people they (refuse to) share the planet with. I will not accept it. There is so much that we had left out in our talk that I find it demands further scrutiny, because my conscience pines away at my previous lack of fortitude to fully confront you about it.

We should explain to our audiences how pseudoscientists like Thomas Malthus, Charles Darwin, Aldous Huxley, and other members of the Anglo Elite have duped us into believing that they are the chosen ones of this planet, and that their theories of resource scarcity, social Darwinism, and eugenics were questionable from the very beginning. 

Let us take a look at Robert Zubrin, author of The Population Control Holocaust, where, in this amazing illustration of socioeconomics, he defines just how Anglo-American ideologues have sought to destroy the remaining populations on Earth, as well as how Malthus himself used his policies to starve out the people of India and Ireland during the reign of the East India Trading company. His theories had nothing to do with protecting the resources of the earth, but served as a mouthpiece of the British Empire to dominate the Earth’s resources. Imperialists typically use their ideas of racial superiority in a vampiric manner. Willie Lynch would agree.

Speaking about the subject of propaganda, prior to World War II, the roots of eugenics began in California and in Great Britain—not in Germany—and under the direct governance of the Human Betterment Foundation and the American Eugenics society, the modern (20th century) eugenics’ movement was born. Its sole purpose was to racially protect the Anglo-American roots of the United States and to hedge against crossbreeding with incoming immigrant ethnicities. Sir Francis Galton, the father of this lie, coined the racial superiority of the world’s elites to be eugenics (eu, ‘well’ + genics, ‘born’). They began setting up large bureaucracies under the supervision of very powerful industrial barons to help reshape the fabric of American society, and this commenced in 1906 with the creation of the Eugenics Record Office in Cold Spring, New York.

There is even an entire website, the Image Archive on the American Eugenics Movement, which is dedicated to the American Eugenics movement, which predates the Germany’s Third Reich by approximately 20 years. Adolf Hitler was the brainchild of eugenicists in America and wrote in admiration of Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race during his imprisonment in Landsberg Jail. Margaret Sanger’s own life experiences with abusive families motivated her to found the American Birth Control League (aka Planned Parenthood), and Prescott Bush, the father of George H.W. Bush, helped the Bush dynasty earn its fortunes by financing the Nazi-Socialist Party. May I refer to an excerpt from the History News Network:

Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California’s quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These organizations–which functioned as part of a closely-knit network–published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudoscientific journals, such as Eugenical Newsand Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.

In general, World War II was simply a beta test for eugenics research around the world using the classic method of ideological polarization and conflict. The Nazis’ Aktion T4 Zusammenfassung, Unit 731 of the Japanese Imperial Army, as well as the American branches of eugenics all experimented throughout the war and yet, many within the American system received greater historical “hospitality” than their puppets imprisoned for the Nuremburg Trials. On the contrary, the amount of data that those within the Truman administration had collected proved useful after the execution of Operation Paperclip (extensively documented by Annie Jacobsen in her book) in 1945, under the President’s direct orders. This objective was to incorporate 1,600 Nazi eugenics scientists, engineers, and other employees of the Third Reich into a wide range of positions within the American government, pharmaceutical industry, military industrial complex, and American corporate media (under Operation Bloodstone), and neurolinguistic programming (Operation Monarch/ Project Artichoke/ MK-Ultra).

They were simply too good to pass up, and to the victor lies the spoils. The “international system” that you speak of was born prior to the formation of the United Nations, around the time the Rockefeller Foundation began funding the League of Nations during US President Woodrow Wilson’s time in office. Keep in mind he was also the president that was forced to sanction the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 that made all of this possible during the First World War.

Also, as you can see, joint research between Princeton University and Northwestern University has confirmed America’s transformation by showing that the will of the people there has been removed from all political inclusion in favor of a corporate dictatorship, or what the Foundation for Economic Education calls “economic fascism”. This system of economic oligarchy operates very much in the same way as Mussolini’s fascist empire or Adolf Hitler’s German Third Reich, and America’s devolvement into this state is the direct result of acquired knowledge of incremental authoritarianism, spearheaded by none other than the Rockefeller Foundation and others. Have you ever noticed, Kevin, how the five permanent members of the UN Security Council have already slaughtered enough of their citizens to gain front row seats in the international community, and that 4 of the 5 permanent members own the largest weapons industries in the world?

The Men Downstairs, the Rockefellers, were the godparents of eugenics in America and Europe. This powerful family became the poster children for the eugenics movement’s successes and became popular amongst circles of Ivy leaguers whom trained them in their ideologies. The tactics used throughout the trilateral eugenics movement were dispersed amongst the wealthiest of the world (outlined in Fritz Springmeyer’s book, The Thirteen Bloodlines of the Illuminati), namely in America, in order to find a way to regain control over society after the Industrial Revolution.

History shows us that the lucrative business of human extermination is most certainly family-owned. HNN elaborates further:

Until the mid-1960s, American population control programs, both at home and abroad, were largely funded and implemented by private organizations such as the Population Council and Planned Parenthood — groups with deep roots in the eugenics movement. While disposing of millions of dollars provided to them by the Rockefeller, Ford, and Milbank Foundations, among others, the resources available to support their work were meager in comparison with their vast ambitions. This situation changed radically in the mid-1960s, when the U.S. Congress, responding to the agitation of overpopulation ideologues, finally appropriated federal funds to underwrite first domestic and then foreign population control programs. Suddenly, instead of mere millions, there were hundreds of millions and eventually billions of dollars available to fund global campaigns of mass abortion and forced sterilization. The result would be human catastrophe on a worldwide scale.

From this, we can see that the American eugenics’ movement evolved throughout and after WWII, and much of what we are dealing with today—the covert, modern day eugenics movement of GMOs, AIDS, SV40, ethnic marginalization, the prison and military industrial complex, foreign wars of attrition, and techtronics—is an accumulation of over a century of eugenics-based philosophical, psychological, medical, and biological research on human population control. The ones promulgating these organizations genuinely believe that what they are doing will lead to a better future. They want their progeny and their ideas to live on, and mass graves for everyone else. This is not about resources. It is about the belief that some people are more superior to others. Therefore, I will disagree with you wholeheartedly on the notion that the international community is responsible for global depopulation. The international community carries these protocols out, but nevertheless, this “community” is nothing more than an extension of the Rockefellers, Carnegies, Fords, Bushes, Sangers, and other “philanthropists” that have sold out humanity for generations. The international community takes orders from these self-proclaimed Titans, and not the other way around.

For instance, David Rockefeller himself addressed the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania in 1974 and used his old, tired argument about controlling the Earth’s population in order to address what Robert D. Kaplan called in his book of the same name, The Coming Anarchy. He would proceed to detail a plan of over 30 years of human depopulation initiatives to complete his work. However, he was quickly challenged by the Schiller Institute’s own Helga Zepp LaRouche, whom exposed his genocidal policies, faulty logic, and expressed the urgency to develop new technologies such as thermonuclear fusion to combat energy scarcity. She would later publish her prolific article, Population Control is a Rockefeller Baby in 1997 on the matter. Nevertheless, David addressed depopulation again during the UN Ambassador’s Dinner in Montreal on September 23, 1994, and even stated himself how he would like the United Nations to contribute to the well being of the planet by “managing” the world’s birth rates.

The American-NATO led international community and all of their agendas may as well be the Rockefeller dynasty. Everything from Agenda 21, civil disarmament, to GMOs comes out of the mouth of this septic, soulless creature, in addition to his other members of the Goetia like Bill Gates, who recently expressed in public his desire to lower the population 10-15 percent through vaccines and genetically modified organisms. David Rockefeller and his family brethren have placed themselves in charge with financing, orchestrating and controlling our international system as though they were the messiahs of the racial hygiene religion. Furthermore, he is a permanent member of the Bilderberg Conference and acts as its only Member Advisory personnel, meaning he handpicks everyone that attends the shadowy conference. He has also founded the Trilateral Commission with Zbigniew Brzezinski, a staunch imperialist and geopolitical monopolist to control all of America, Europe, and Japan in order to steer the direction entire global pogrom.

The good news is that the international community is not united on this protocol, nor will it ever, because each country has its own interests at stake. Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and other sovereign nations under attack from the New World Order, do not need to give up its oil to anyone. Russia is aware that the entire crisis in East Ukraine has occurred because the International Monetary Fund and other “humanitarian” members of the international community used neo-Fascist groups such as Svoboda and Right Sector to fulfill Brzezinski’s wet dream of removing Ukraine from its economic orbit. It is no wonder that the United States could sanction the use of fascists in Kyiv because it is in the DNA of American blue bloods to do so. They share the same ideology. However, their hubris aside, they also understand it will only lead to further embarrassment as European nations are not so keen to march into another war; namely one with the world’s largest nuclear powers and proven oil reserves. If combined, Europe will learn the meaning of the phrase “Cold War” and “nuclear winter”.

Keep in mind that the strength in America’s global hegemony lies in the truth that there is no value in the fiat US Federal Reserve note. After the removal of the Bretton-Woods system in 1971 by Richard Nixon, America’s foreign entanglements have kept the petrodollar afloat by monopolizing foreign reserves of oil in Iraq, Kuwait, Nigeria, and other OPEC nations. Oil is the most widely traded commodity in dollars, and any rise in the power of BRICS nation allies or non-aligned countries threatens dollar hegemony. The entire war in Iraq had nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, but with Saddam Hussein’s challenge to the petrodollar by selling Iraqi oil in Euros. It also had nothing to do with creating artificial scarcity; close to 1 million Iraqis were murdered as a result of the actions of a few in the ranks of the eugenics-based Bush administrations to control crude oil markets. 

F. William Engdahl outlined this clearly in his essay, “We are in the Midst of an Epochal Tectonic Shift” in which he described in detail how creating economic scarcity in the petroleum markets was the work of barons operating on the International Economic Exchange, an institution fully owned and in cahoots with Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase (again, those Rockefellers), and Morgan Stanley. Seeking Alpha columnist Phillip Davis also outlines how this organization created oil price spikes through speculating on events in the MENA region in order to rake in billions of dollars in derivatives profits and corporate consultations.

Furthermore, energy analyst Gregor Macdonald stated that the energy market had nothing to do with what is actually inventoried, but with the production capacity of the suppliers. “In truth, the spare capacity that the world cares about—that the oil futures market cares about—is not the inventory level. But rather, actual production capacity that can be brought on immediately,” he mentioned.

America can produce an average of 8.5 million barrels per diem of oil but uses approximately 20 billion a day, not because of artificial scarcity, but because of oil lobbying groups like the Koch Brothers completely interfering with any kind of technological progress by Americans to develop a high-speed railway, or widely used, energy efficient cars. They cause America to rely heavily on the petrol industry, so would that not make your scarcity argument counterproductive? Where is the innovation to create sustainable energy markets in the US when lobbying groups crush any chance of this happening? America’s transportation systems are crumbling due to a lack of funding sustainable projects, and other countries are light years away. Even Britain has made some adjustments to their railway system, as keeping an updated railway reduces strain on roads and staves off petrol dependency. Besides, all of the production jobs have been sent overseas, so the argument that America needs to consume too much oil for production is completely useless.

Finally, the Club of Rome and the Committee of 300’s plan entitled “The Green Revolution” have long worked to use global warming as propaganda to systematically fund Agenda 21 policies via carbon taxes schemes payable to the United Nations. This was promptly put to rest after the Earth’s magnetic poles flipped in 2013 and solar ejections that had occurred during Solar Cycle 24, which had been predicted in a paper and exposed that the Landscheidt Minimum had been achieved; the sun would go through a process of cooling. In the climate, the greatest driving force has, and always will be, the phenomenon of solar forcing. Climate change is merely the financing mechanism of the New World Order and is nothing more than pure deception written with few substantiated claims from the IPCC to back it.

So, dear Kevin, there is a plethora of evidence that suggests the following: (1) the origins of the global depopulation initiative are under the control of the Rockefeller dynasty and American eugenicists (2) the New World Order is not an obscure entity, but an extension of the families that control the American and British Eugenics movements, (3) the purpose of global depopulation, as well as its initiatives, has historically been meant to subdue and depopulate specific groups of people that have been deemed genetically inferior to the global elite and (4) eugenics ideologies are based on the pseudosciences of economic scarcity, climate change, peak oil, and have been created for the sole purpose of oppressing the people stated in point 3, and (5) there are technologies mankind has already invented to solve world hunger, water shortages, space, and consumption usages without depopulation, but they have been suppressed through the ages due to lobbying groups and private entities.

We both equally express concerns over the long-term implications of the plan to kill off 80% of the world population. It was written in the Georgia Guidestones, the elite’s version of the Ten Commandments, to maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature, and this is precisely the program the global elite will use to turn back the clock on human progress. The social engineers of our world do not represent the breadth of human experience, nor do they have any place or connection with it. The systematic control of populations is the cornerstone of mankind’s troubles and because of this, both of us are obliged to inform the public of this plan. If they reduce the world to around 14% of its current population, rest assured, it would never be a democratic, inclusive process. Nothing in the international order will be from that point on, either.

I still do not feel as if I have even begun to scratch the surface on these issues. There are so many things we could speak about in depth here, but time and space do not allow it at the moment. Keep in touch and here’s wishing you the best in your fight to illuminate the masses.


Haneul Na’avi